Category Archives: Politics

Ready, Aim … Fired

Image

 

By GORDON GLANTZ

Gordonglantz50@gmail.com

@Managing2Edit

 GORDONVILLE — We of the GCP – Gun Control Patrol – have a new martyr.

It could, should and would be a victim of a mass shooting — the events that have become so commonplace that they are barely mentioned on the nightly news anymore.

Or a victim of knee-jerk gun violence, like the black woman recently shot to death in Detroit for having the temerity to knock on a white person’s door for help after being involved in a car crash.

Or the toddlers who shoot themselves with the loaded guns kept their homes of their “responsible” caregivers,

But that pain is too recent and raw for all you Joe and Joanne Duh-Plumbers to wrap your mitts around.

So, as public service, we numb it up and dumb it down.

Enter Dick Metcalf, a man’s man seemingly born with a gun in his hand.

His curious case is an example of everything that has gone haywire in what should be a logical debate on the issue. We are left with a band aid to put on the figurative wound that is runaway gun violence, circa 2013.

Guns and Ammo Magazine, which bills itself the “world’s most widely read firearms magazine,” seemed to have turned a corner toward common sense when it printed an editorial – “Let’s Talk Limits” — by Metcalf, a contributing editor.

In the editorial, Metcalf wrote: “Way too many gun owners still seem to believe that any regulation of the right to keep and bear arms is an infringement. … The fact is, all constitutional rights are regulated, always have been, and need to be. …  All U.S. citizens have a right to keep and bear arms, but I do not believe that they have a right to use them irresponsibly.”

And if the magazine’s power trust was OK with those words, which are far from radical and merely mirror what the vast majority of Americans think and feel, they should have foreseen — and been prepared — to handle the inevitable storm from readers when the December edition rolled out.

Instead, the bosses – namely editor Jim Bequette — buckled. The much-maligned Second Amendment trumped the more sacred First Amendment.

In response to backlash described as “immense,” particularly from the bastion of utter stupidity known as social media — the place where the tail wags the dog in the world of mass communications — Bequette folded like a house of cards.

He posted a hasty apology to readers threatening to pull their subscriptions faster than they pull the trigger on an unsuspecting deer during hunting season.

“Dick Metcalf has had a long and distinguished career … but his association with ‘Guns & Ammo’ has officially ended,” wrote Bequette .

Setting himself up for Weasel of the Year honors, Bequette added: “In publishing Metcalf’s column, I was untrue to that tradition, and for that I apologize. His views do not represent mine — nor, most important, ‘Guns & Ammo’s. It is very clear to me that they don’t reflect the views of our readership either.”

Like, duh?

Your magazine represents a readership imbedded in a subculture in which six percent of Americans are hunters.

Bequette, who was going to vacate his post on Jan. 1 anyway, then announced that he would be hastening his departure.

Bye.

Who looks like the hero? I suppose Metcalf, but remember he was still a shill for this same pro-gun stance anyway. He just had some sort of burst of logic, which cost him his gig.

While magazines differ from newspapers, in that they are niche publications catering to readers paying for certain wants and needs, the real loser here is the First Amendment.

You know, the pesky one that guarantees free speech, including that of the press, as well as freedom of religion. Revolutionary in its time — unlike the Second Amendment, which merely mirrored some 17th century English law — is it also protected the right to peaceably assemble.

And there was one about petitioning the government for a redress of grievances.

 

We of the GCP have plenty of those.

Thousands upon thousands per year.

Enough that the Second Amendment should get a second look.

Dick Metcalf saw the light and put it into words.

Instead, he was shot down.

You may call it the price of doing business.

I call it a crime.

 

 

 

Bad Medicine – On The House

Image

By GORDON GLANTZ

Gordonglantz50@gmail.com

@Mananging2Edit

GORDONVILLE – And in Switzerland … the government is voting on whether to give every citizen $2,800 a month in guaranteed income.

Go ahead and yodel.

I’ll wait.

Key word there, for all you anti-immigration types, is “citizen.”

Sounds like enough motivation to get on the path to citizenship.

But we are talking about a government that is not dysfunctional. Switzerland, after all, is ranked in the top 10 in happiness and in several key economic areas.

The reality is that our alleged democracy — from which Switzerland strays a bit with a federalized yin and yang that gets more democratic on the local levels, where it really matters – features “leaders” who let we the people suffer while they can’t agree on the time of day.

Even with Swiss Army watches.

Can you handle more?

Good.

Time for some more bad medicine (Don’t worry. The pills are on the house here in Gordonville, where we have single-payer, socialized medicine.).

What Is: There is a lot of vitriol out there, blaming President Barack Obama for the shutdown.

And What Should Never Be: Straying from the point.

Only the House, not the president, has the power to shut down the government.

And that is what happened here.

They are the ones who put people out of work and kept World War II veterans from their monument in Washington, D.C.

The haters will point to Obama’s 37 percent approval rating.

Let us point to the 28 percent approval rating of the Republicans that have conspired to block him at every turn since Day Uno (yes, the bastardized Spanish is intended to annoy).

That is one percentage point more than those of who believe Sasquatch — slave name Bigfoot – might be a for-real dude.

Sounds crazy, but I actually had more belief his wandered around the forest – I saw him with my own eyes on that episode of “The Six Million Dollar Man” – than I ever approved of the modern-day GOP.

And that goes back to before it was hijacked by the Tea Party.

What Is: Yawn … They are still playing baseball.

And What Should Never Be: Anyone caring.

I mean, if you live in those metropolitan areas with teams still involved, fine.

Here, in Philly, where the Phillies were pretty much caput when they went into the tank right after showing a pulse before the all-star break?

Nah.

I know none of our teams are much to write home about, but we have three others going.

We have college football and college hoops on the horizon.

I can understand loving baseball, even though I only like it as a friend, but I don’t get all these Philadelphia people getting so hyped up about the Pittsburgh Pirates.

Seemed like there was more of a need for suicide watch hotlines in the Delaware Valley than the western part of the state, where they are rightfully more football-obsessed, when the Bucs got bucked from the field by St. Louis from the playoffs.

If the shoe were on the other foot, do you think anyone in the Pittsburgh area would be losing sleep over the Phillies?

What Is: One of the sad byproducts of the shutdown is that real issues, namely gun control, are not being addressed by our misleaders.

And What Should Never Be: The eye off the ball, kind of like it is when the Second Amendment is misunderstood.

There he goes again? Yep, there I go again.

This is one of those issues I won’t debate for the sake of it and walk away agreeing to disagree. I was always for gun control, but the massacre in Newtown, Conn. – which miraculously prompted GOP leaders with NRA monies in their war chests to suddenly to take note of black kids in Chicago and Baltimore – is where I drew the line.

Put this in your pipes and smoke it: We account for 5 percent of the world’s population but 80 percent of the deaths in the planet’s 23 richest countries.

Rich, despite our current recession/depression? Yes.

Morally bankrupt? Affirmative.

What Is: Many who call themselves “Christians” (said with a southern twang for effect) weigh down the GOP with “morals” issues.

And What Should Never Be: Conservative Christians.

I’m mean, they can be. It’s a free country. Just don’t be in my face.

The two concepts – Christianity and conservatism — just don’t equate.

It’s like that short dude from “Game of Thrones” trying to play center for the 76ers.

OK, they could probably use him down low. Bad analogy, but it’s early in the morning and I’m a night person.

You get the point.

It’s like stating that all men are created equal and then having to pass a Civil Rights Act to start to make it happen nearly 200 years later.

OK, that happened.

But you get me here.

How about this one? These conservative “Christians” are among those standing firm against Obamacare (also the Affordable Care Act for the ignorant among us).

Forget the supernatural stuff about dying and being resurrected. Take the historical Jesus and what he is purported to have represented.

Ask yourselves, did he heal for profit?

If the answer is no, you are “Christians” in name only.

What Is: A chap named Peter Baker has a book coming out claiming that George W. Bush, presidential disgrace that he was, had a tepid relationship with Dick Cheney that turned completely cold after Bush refused to pardon Scooter Libby (no one called “Scooter” should be pardoned, just on principle).

And What Should Never Be: Thinking anyone is all evil.

I guess Bush has some redeeming qualities after all, as Cheney is all evil.

If the book is accurate, that is.

Baker, a reporter for the New York Times, did work in Moscow. They could have brainwashed him and sent him back as a spy.

What Is: John McCain was quoted as saying his party, the GOP, has done the American people a “disservice.”

And What Should Never Be: Finding a GPS that helps you back to being yourself.

Once upon a time in America, I used to say that McCain would be that one Republican I would consider voting for as president.

I didn’t agree with everything (whisper: I don’t agree with everything Obama stands for, either), but he was a maverick.

And that label, while sounding cool – and American – is not something to be taken lightly.

Those were stripes he earned.

But then, after W. backstabbed McCain out of the way in the 2000 primary, he did himself a “disservice” once he got the chance to run for president in 2008.

He picked Sarah Palin as his vice presidential candidate, letting the Tea Party genie out of the bottle.

Now he is trying to stuff it back in.

It’s nice that he sees the errors of his ways, but once it’s out …

Good night, John Boy.

What Is: Haven’t heard much from Syria lately, have you?

What Should Never Be: Forgetting to knock wood.

Seems like the process of quelling the violence and eliminating chemical weapons, without putting one American in harm’s way, is working.

Give Obama some credit, or would you rather harp on the murky Benghazi scenario some more?

As for what happens in Syria, and these other Arab countries allegedly going through spring, I’m not overly interested.

Let’s say I’m neutral.

Like Switzerland.

 

 

Defusing The ‘Cruz’ Missile

Image

By GORDON GLANTZ

Gordonglantz50@gmail.com

@Managing2Edit

“All are mad but me and thee, and sometimes I question thee.”

-My Uncle Sylvan

GORDONVILLE — There goes the advice our elders gave us about making fools of ourselves in public.

Put another one on the “I don’t know what to tell me daughter now” list.

Sen. Ted Cruz spends 21 hours begging to be taken away by the men in the white coats and the White House in 2016 beckons – at least until the novelty wears off.

According to the Washington Post, Cruz’s 21-hour filibuster against Obamacare funding, which included reading a Dr. Seuss book but no bathroom break, has “leapfrogged” him to the front of the pack of rabid wolves in a Public Policy Poll.

The poll also revealed that GOP primary voters – an odd mix of corporate benefactors and trailer trash — suddenly have more trust in Cruz than other party leaders on Capitol Hill.

That says all there needs to be said about Cruz, the other party leaders or the same GOP voters who gave us George W. Bush twice upon a forgettable time and actually pulled a lever for a ticket that had Sarah “Palm Reader” Palin as the vice presidential candidate.

The lead for the Texas senator was not a big one, but don’t take much heart in that.

Following Cruz, who pulled in 20 percent of the nods, had pulled ahead of recent front-runner – and equally steadfast in draconian beliefs — Kentucky Sen. Rand Paul, who checked in at 17 percent.

New Jersey Gov. Chris Christie – about the only name in the mix I can stomach (partial pun intended) – followed at 14 percent. Next, from the Royal House of Bush, we had former Florida Gov. Jeb Bush.

“Ted Cruz this week established himself as the grassroots hero of the Republican party,” said Dean Debnam, president of PPP. “The party has more faith in him than (its) more official leaders like Mitch McConnell and John Boehner.”

His pre-shutdown schtick clearly, and amazingly, had an impact on the numbed-down and dumbed-down voting populace on the tea-bagged right.

He is up eight percentage points since July. The rise came from those who consider themselves “very conservative” (code for a lot of words, not many of which are in sync with the same 10 commandments they want to see plastered in public places) and by those who favored the shutdown by a margin of 75 percent to 10.

“Our numbers also suggest that Cruz is now viewed more broadly as the leader of the Republican Party,” the poll analysis said. “He now has more credibility with the GOP base than the folks who have been leading the party for years.”

The poll, which surveyed 743 Republican primary voters on Sept. 25 and Sept 26, carries a margin of error of 3.6 percent.

Make that margin for error 100 percent.

This hero is a zero.

Cruz as a presidential nominee would only serve to make America a more hateful and divided place than it has already become since his Tea Party, instead of manning up and forming a third party, hijacked any remaining modicum of rational thought within the GOP.

While his 21-hour charade may equate to being this clown’s 15 minutes of fame, we should still prepare for the worst and hope for the best when considering presidential scenarios for 2016.

We should see Cruz more than a guy blessed with an expansive bladder.

We should lift the hood and take a look at what is inside.

This dude needs more than a tune up. He needs an engine, circa the 1950s – when Dwight D. Eisenhower was the last of the sane Republican presidents.

What is most illuminating, especially when one considers he is standing on the shoulders of many “birthers” (those trying to make President Barack Obama illegitimate because they insist he was born in Kenya), is that Cruz really was not born in the United States.

And for those haters out there who took fiendish pleasure in saying our president’s full name – Barack Hussein Obama – with flames shooting out of their dragon tongues, one wonders what the response will be when they learn “Ted” is really named “Rafael.”

His father was from Cuba – you know, just like Obama’s absentee biological father was from Kenya – and it is unclear about his American citizenship. Like good Texans, both of his parents were in the oil business. Mom – an “American” originally from Wilmington, Del. — were living in Canada when the stork delivered little Rafael’s egg in Calgary, Alberta.

Honestly, this really shouldn’t – or wouldn’t – be an issue if so much weren’t made of Obama’s lineage. John McCain, defeated by Obama in 2008, was born out of the country as well, but only because his father was in the military.

Ditto for the fact that Cruz is well-educated, having gone to Princeton and then Harvard Law School — except that Obama was termed an “elitist” for also rising from obscurity to achieve that level of schooling.

Laughable irony aside, Cruz – who conveniently says “I’m Cuban, Irish, and Italian, and yet somehow I ended up Southern Baptist” — has enough red flags without playing gotcha about where he was born.

Consider his textbook Tea Party report card, which shows no creative thought or problem-solving skills:

-In March of this year, three months removed from the Newtown massacre, Cruz stood with Paul in stating he would filibuster any and all gun control legislation. His grade from the NRA is an A-plus. Not sure how one gets more than A without genuflecting in front of Charleton Heston, but there you go.

-He flatly opposes same-sex marriage. What else can you say? An emerging leader – a cult “hero” — with such a closed mind is not where this country should be headed, but that is the state of today’s GOP.

-We know how he feels about the Affordable Care Act (the same thing as Obamacare, despite what viewers of the Jimmy Kimmel Show think), but really offers no option for society’s most vulnerable. This guy is Scrooge, before those pesky ghosts gave him a character adjustment.

-He is a Bush disciple. Enough said. Once you swim in that cesspool, there is no getting clean. Cruz joined the campaign in 1999 as a domestic policy adviser and played a key real role in the legal team that sealed the stolen election. Bush returned the favor, naming him associate deputy attorney general in the U.S. Department of Justice and later director of policy planning at the U.S. Federal Trade Commission (two posts that he likely considers trim-worthy fat in the Obama administration).

It may surprise even long-term readers to learn that I am not theoretically opposed to voting Republican. I have done so, on the local level, close to 50 percent of the time. I always voted for Arlen Specter, despite that irksome magic bullet thing, but I have yet to step to the right for president.

Doing so, eventually, is kind of on my political bucket list.

How so?

I have core belief that neither party should own in the Oval Office for more than two terms, so it goes against the grain.

But the GOP, with the likes of Cruz as its face, makes it difficult.

And so it is.

And on it goes — this underlying, and destructive, civil war of ours.

You want to elect Jefferson Davis II, be prepared for the consequences.

The Heat Of The Moment

Image
 
By GORDON GLANTZ
@Managing2Edit
 
GORDONVILLE – I like it hot.
Come the winter, can’t crank the heat enough. There are not enough layers, when the temperature dares to plummet around the freezing mark, to keep me from looking like an Eskimo.
Ice is my Kryptonite. Snow is one of the four-letter words you can’t utter in Gordonville without drawing a fine for using profanity in public.
In the summer, well, no diving into a cold pool for the thrill others get from an instant chill. A hot shower, even on a hot day, is a must.
Don’t believe in iced coffee or tea or anything of the sort. They are monstrosities, each of them. You might as well have a warm soda or lemonade (drinks of the devil that this diabetic can’t have anyway).
So, it was no surprise that I found myself in hot water this past Wednesday.
But this time, too much heat to feel comfortable.
It was one of the most solemn days on the calendar, Sept. 11. It was the 12th anniversary of the worst attack on United States soil, which left around 3,000 dead and a nation changed.
The fact that it was the 12th anniversary, not the 10th or 15th, placed it a notch down on the national consciousness meter.
Why does an anniversary have to end in a zero or a five to have enhanced meaning?
That’s just one of my pet peeves that have grown so numerous that, in my steady march to being a grumpy old man, I now need to rent a warehouse to store them.
Another peeve, more directly connected with 9/11, is the growing parlor game of people telling each other where they were when they heard the news of the planes striking the twin towers.
It’s better than blowing it off altogether, but it has grown a bit monotonous and outdated.
I saw a thread on Facebook, sighed, and was going to let it go. Then someone wrote they were at the dentist, getting their teeth cleaned and added that he will never forget it.
Actually, I got my teeth cleaned Wednesday. I’m not going to forget it either; rarely do.
So I jumped in, exercised my right of free speech and dropped in my old “it doesn’t matter where you were then. Where are you now?” line that hoped would get the masses to repent upon themselves.
No dice.
Instead, people just got offended. I played a little defense – I have this thing about getting the last word – but I felt the healthier approach was to start a thread on my own page that also ruffled feathers (although my responses there were a tad more measured and eloquent).
I didn’t want to alienate or belittle anyone who was at least taking the time from happily wandering through another day with not a care about anything but saving their own asses to reflect, albeit in a vacuum, but that’s how I came across to most.
And I really don’t like to be misunderstood.
To clear it up, I made an analogy, saying it was like a script or a book, where the story line needs to be advanced toward its natural end. My point was that just saying where you were, without taking it a step further in how it affected you in a post-9/11 world, is like repeating the opening scene of a film or re-reading the first chapter of book.
I was challenged by one pretty intelligent person, the son of the source of the original post, to lay out such a script.
I couldn’t do it there, in the space provided – not to mention while typing on my iPad – but I’m going to try here without going past my self-imposed word limit for a blog post.
The indie flick – “Where Were You Then? Where Are You Now?” – would take place in a fictitious Anytown, U.S.A. kind of a place. This town, which we’ll call Wellsboro, is past its Glory Days. The factories that made it what it was in the post-Depression years are either closed or slowed to a serious crawl. However, the peace and prosperity of the Bill Clinton presidency gave it a bit of a bump, with some dot.com companies and pharmaceuticals moving in and even spurring some new real estate development.
The film will begin on Sept. 11, 2001 and depict the reactions from varying perspectives of people around town, including that of a large family in the working class neighborhood of well-kept twin homes and a towering Catholic church that is the epicenter of all activity.
The church is so large, in fact, that it obscures the sunlight — or the effect of a full moon — in the working class part of town (gotta love symbolism).
An emergency meeting is called at the newspaper on how to cover the attack with a hopeful intent of blending national and international coverage with local reaction.
With 10 reporters all pulled off their regular beats and made what the editor called “free agents” for the day, the objective is easily met.
One reporter covers a prayer vigil at an African-American church. Another goes to a nearby Army reserve barracks and also talks to a recruiter situated at a shopping mall. There is a side bar on local World War II veterans, many of whom came home to work in Wellsboro’s factories, and how the attack on Pearl Harbor changed their lives. Another story is written on a bomb threat at a preschool, which turns out to have been called in anonymously to close the school early.
Another reporter goes around town and asks people where they were and what they were doing when they heard the news, a story which captures the raw emotion of the day.
The staff wins an award for its coverage.
As the script moves along through the subsequent years, the current events are seen through the headlines of the local paper – as well as real television clips – to show the changes from the initial sense of national unity to skepticism.
But in the working class neighborhood, where money is short and pro-life families are large, it is common for young men – and women – to enlist in the military. With the price of college too oppressive, the job prospects next to nil and the chance to march the same footsteps of their fathers and grandfathers too alluring, they willingly leave their families with one less mouth to feed for the chance to come home in one piece and tell war stories at the local VFW.
The local paper does its best to write stories about the soldiers, putting a human face on a war that seems eminent when President George W. Bush makes his case for war in Iraq, and also covers as many homecomings as possible.
After this campaign is declared a “mission accomplished,” there is premature adulation and the paper pretty much declares the war won.
Years go by, the casualties of the open-ended war hit locally, particularly with the family that is featured in the film, as a son is killed and his sister seriously injured by a bomb blast while working as a medic. Moreover, a cousin comes home with post-traumatic stress syndrome.
The price of war, in dollars and sense also takes its toll in Wellsboro. The dot.com bubble bursts, the McMansions built on the outskirts of town have foreclosures and the factories – as well as many shops – are shuttered. Rough economic times lead to disharmony between ethnic groups that had gotten along for decades, while the growing Hispanic population becomes an easy target for hate.
At the paper, there aren’t layoffs. Instead, when people leave, they aren’t replaced. The reporter staff that did so well covering relevant stories on 9/11 dwindles from 10 to seven to four.
Because of less ads – 30 percent is the standard – the paper is smaller. Still, with so few reporters, smoke and mirrors replace quality and thorough journalism.
Even though the crime rate skyrockets, the paper misses a lot of the stories because of lack of manpower, instead filling the space with feel-good pictures without accompanying stories.
This is exemplified in our movie when Sept. 11, 2011, the 10th anniversary, rolls around and the only option – in lieu of more blanket coverage – is to solicit readers to write or e-mail their remembrances of where they were and what they were doing.
It is a cheap trick, and they know it, but they get enough to achieve the objective and get through the event.
It then becomes a standard method, come each 9/11.
Despite the wounds the event created in Wellsboro, the local news source never picks at the scab.
The final scene is 2014, the 13th anniversary. There is a small and rather unimpressive ceremony in the town square. It pales in comparison to those of the previous years, and the leaders of Wellsboro promise something better for the 15th anniversary in 2016 while quietly hoping they are no longer on the hot seat of being on the council of a town that became so economically depressed as a direct result of the war years.
A well-intentioned and wide-eyed new reporter, who was 8 years old in 2001, asks her editors if she should do a man on the street interview – which is the standard approach – about reaction to the news that Haliburton made 30 billion dollars from the Iraqi War.
The editors laugh at her, telling her instead to go to the town square and ask people for very brief responses to the standard “Do you remember where you were on 9/11?” question. When she asks what “very brief” means, she is told no more than one or two sentences.
Since she was so young at time of the attack, she is relieved – even if it goes against the grain of everything she was just taught in college.
She is also reminded to goad people into Tweeting their remembrances for a Social Media presence on Twitter, but to remind people of the character limit of a Tweet.
Displeased with the lack of depth from the answers she is getting, the reporter keeps trying.
Off alone, on a bench at the edge of the town square, she encounters the mother of the family hit so hard by the events that followed 9/11.
The reporter approaches, and asks for a brief remembrance.
The mother, whose hair has turned completely gray in the subsequent years, stares at the reporter with eyes that show no more life and then asks back if she can talk about it now and it has affected she and her family.
The reporter apologizes but says the responses have to be specific and brief but adds that the woman has the option of Twitter, but adds that there is a character limit of 117.
She hands the woman a card, which the camera shows dropping to the ground and blowing away as the Steve Earle song “Rich Man’s War” begins to play and the final credits roll.
I know it’s kind of cold, but sometimes that’s what we need to wake the heck up and realize that everything – and I mean everything – is a link in a chain.
To drive the point home, after the final credit, we’ll show a graphic of the war casualties — and the war’s prize, which directly caused the economy to fail — and then the meaning of cause and effect.
Where were you? 
That’s the cause. 
Let’s start eyeballing the effect, and think about where you are now.
I know people don’t want to hear it.
I know it means donning those uncomfortable thinking caps.
And I know this puts me back on the hot seat.
That’s cool.
I like it hot.
 
 

Defeating the Kobayashi Maru

Image

By GORDON GLANTZ

Gordonglantz50@gmail.com

@Managing2Edit

GORDONVILLE – As we sat around the dinner table – you know, kind of like “The Waltons” (Sofia even insists we take turns saying grace, which is a challenge when it’s my turn because I feel I need to leave the word God out of it) – we commenced discussing this Syria situation.

It was Saturday, and my head was still spinning from Temple’s 28-6 loss/moral victory against Notre Dame (my young Owls were 30-point underdogs) and the Eagles’ inexplicable roster cuts (no Chris McCoy, really?), but CNN on in the background helped refocus the conversation.

My mother, Sofia’s Nana, seems the most obsessed about it (you know seniors, when they get stuck on something). The wife, Sofia’s Mama, seeks a solution as an intellectual challenge.

Me? I don’t see why the Eagles need six cornerbacks on the active roster when two have broken hands …

Oh wait, Syria.

Yeah, that’s a tough call.

Damned if we do, damned if we don’t (and damn, don’t I enjoy the freedom to use a word like “damned”).

“Kind of reminds me of the Kobayashi Maru,” I said.

“Wait … what?” said a little voice.

Yeah, that was Sofia, already talking like Taylor Swift as an incoming missile of a first-grader.

I know, right? (Yep, she says that, too).

So I had to explain that it was not a new Japanese restaurant, which was important to clarify since her Mama has a Sushi addiction (I’ll have to save that line for a song).

It derives from the alternate universe that is Star Trek. As Trekkies know – I am a hidden Trekkie, as I’ll watch the original series for hours but not be caught dead at a convention – the Kobayaski Maru, while not a bad name for a high-end Japanese food joint, is a Starfleet test.

Cadets, as shown in the opening scene of the fine flick “Star Trek II: The Wrath of Khan,” have to find a way to survive in a simulated no-win scenario.

After the commander in training, a fine Vulcan chick (despite the ears) named Saarek, flunks – and first-time viewers are led to believe everyone is really dead on the ship – Kirk walks through a door in the mock bridge and engages Saarek in constructive criticism.

“I don’t believe in the no-win scenario,” he says.

Kirk, as it turns out, is the only cadet to have avoided losing.

How so?

He cheated, programming the computer ahead of time, for which he received a commendation for “original thinking.”

As much of a glass-half-empty type of a guy as I am – particularly with sports and traffic jams – I am kind of with Kirk, a role model of sorts (although Mr. Spock, with his logic, appeals the most).

Syria might be a lose-lose – as most scenarios in the arcane Arab world are (Spring or no Spring) – but the president, blessed with an IQ double that of his predecessor, will at least join Temple and find a way to beat the spread and record a moral victory.

I think Obama should wait – at least until after the Eagles open the season on Monday Night Football, Sept. 9.

The wife thinks he should put the onus on Congress a little, as it is a political wedge issue at home as much as it is a moral one in Syria.

Nana, she just holds her head, not knowing what to do.

“I would attack now,” says a little voice.

Why? We ask.

“To surprise them,” she responds.

And it’s not like she hasn’t been giving it some deep thought.

As soon as she heard about it, she said: “Another war? Not again. I don’t believe it.”

And then she broke out her map to locate Syria and study the logistics.

While she was more upset Saturday afternoon that Disney Jr. did away with her favorite game on its website, our little Hillary Clinton was refocused on world affairs come dinner time.

The question arose about whether or not Syria bordered Israel. I said it did, but Nana dared to doubt me (I guess that’s fair, considering the grades I brought home). Sofia backed her Daddy up, breaking out her trusty map (after grilling me over where I put it after tidying up the family room that often looks like Hurricane Katrina blew through and George W. Bush sent “Brownie” to deal with it).

After she put it away, the question arose as to whether Syria was also bordered by a body of water. In an instant replay, my affirmative response was not good enough. Sofia went for the map again and pointed it out.

“See, Nana, the Mediterranean Sea,” she replied.

And yes, she rattled off that word – with its 13 letters and six syllables – as if it were “gaga.”

It’s been that kind of summer with Sofia.

For me, she has found a way to help me win the no-win scenario.

And I will be so eternally grateful that I vow to spoil her rotten forever.

I know I was already doing that, but you get the point.

That car at 16 is looking good, even if she isn’t allowed to drive it until she is 30.

Meanwhile, at 6, she continues to do and say amazing things – like the morning she got up first (a true rarity, as she is a night owl like her Daddy) and sat quietly under a hallway light and made a list of all the states and their capitals.

Or like the time she got her dolls ready for a tea party for hours, including writing up invitations (she tried to make the cats sit still for the party but it didn’t work).

Or the time I came home late from the recording studio and she scurried out into the hall to issue a whispered warning: “Mommy’s not happy with you.”

It’s terrific that Sofia is smart, but even better that she has – at least so far – a desire to learn.

She had a summer reading list knocked out by June, and her math workbook nailed by July. She has a first-grade primer she does just for fun. Ditto for drawing and crafts.

She also throws the cutest tantrums when she doesn’t get her way, or when she is misunderstood or rushed, and it’s hard to get her off the computer and/or iPad.

She can be bad.

But it’s all good.

She is better than any mind-numbing tranquilizer. It has been the best, most carefree summer of my “adult” life.

We have gone on multi-night stays in Hershey and the Eastern Shore of Maryland (she was a little bored at Annapolis, but was a good sport for my sake). She also took day trips to Dutch Wonderland and Crystal Cave.

She got a new kitten, Hershey, giving us a feline hat trick (even though Sofia is a little allergic).

In between, I have been her chauffeur for all kinds of stuff – piano lessons, swimming lessons, music camp and gymnastics.

But it’s not just about where she has gone and what she has done. It has been a blessing – there I said it – to be in the here and now with her, without having to worry about rushing off to work all the time and coming home after she is already asleep.

There have been glimpses into the future, too. In tears, she confessed that some of the girls in her dance class this past year could do cartwheels and that the teacher praised them – and one specifically – for being graceful.

You could see the betrayal in her face when Nana let it slip, after pinky-swearing not to tell, which kid from Kindergarten Sofia considered her boyfriend (this happened while Sofia was pretending to be at a café in France and making Nana be the waitress).

I played dumb, telling Sofia I didn’t hear what Nana said because my hearing aid wasn’t in, but I don’t think she bought it.

Being able to share this extended quality time with her – negotiating like union-versus-management to get her to practice the piano and watching “The Family Guy” from 11 to midnight (although she thought it was a good idea to put on Al-Jazeera to get “their point of view” Saturday night) – has taken the losing hand I was dealt by being left jobless and turned it into into a royal flush.

They say that it is he who laughs last, laughs the loudest.

I have had some loud laughs this summer, so I guess I’m laughing last.

And it’s all because of Sofia and her ability to turn my my Kobayashi Maru into a win — without even cheating.

Related articles

The Revolution Starts Now

Image

By GORDON GLANTZ

Gordonglantz50@gmail.com

@Managing2Edit

 

GORDONVILLE — So I was rapping to this guy the other day, and I was describing some ordinary situation in my day. I added that it annoyed the heck out of me.

His response: “Everything annoys you.”

Well, not everything.

But enough “things” that the point is well-taken and met with little resistance.

Near the top of the AL – Annoyance List, not American League – standings is the propensity on the nightly news, usually on a Sunday, to list the top movies of the week.

The criteria? The box office sales are it, which is really a sad commentary on culture, given the subject matter of the majority of the movies.

Want to raise the bar on Hollywood, challenging it to do better than it does with lame scripts and gratuitous violence? Change the approach. Why not list the “best” movies, according to critics, that week?

Dumb?

Not so, dumb-dumb.

Not an alien concept, really. AP and USA Today release Top 25 rankings for college football and basketball – among other sports – on a weekly basis. Those votes are also based on media observations from those with trained eyes.

Why doesn’t this happen in the movie universe? Well, if you subscribe to the theory that everything is a conspiracy until proven otherwise, Hollywood is in cahoots with the networks that broadcast these lists of high-budget B movies.

It’s not that, say, science fiction cannot have a role in storytelling. At its best, the genre uses an alternate setting to send a strong message. But how often, realistically, does that happen anymore?

I have an idea for the perfect sci-fi thriller, as it eerily hits close to home. It need not be set too far into the future, either. Maybe 50-75 years, tops.

And it is rooted in today’s headlines.

Seems that a day doesn’t go by without hearing of bears infringing upon man’s arrogant eminent domain and attacking and mauling, right? Ditto for coyotes. And we all know about deer daring to get in our way on the roads to the extent that hunting season is cast in a way that is supposed to be for our best interest – and that of the hunted (LOL!). And we are also getting more reports of shark attacks than ever.

Some of it is the 24-hour news cycle and Internet bringing this stuff to light more readily, but it’s hard to buy as the only reason.

Where there is smoke, there is fire.

So here is the plot. The bucks, with their mighty antlers, decide to get angry about the violence perpetrated against their women and children and begin turning aggressive toward human women and children. The bears, the sharks and coyotes – and maybe alligators and snakes — follow suit.

The only way to stem the tide is for the adult male of the future where just about all (49 of 50) are stricken with autism (1 in 50 boys now, in 2013, and the epidemic is getting worse, so it’s not outlandish) to find a way to communicate and work together, to create an environment where we can co-exist with these animals again and reverse the risk factors for Austism Spectrum Disorder – clearly in the polluted air, the food loaded with additives and medication we take in the U.S. at a rate well beyond that of the rest of the planet – to have that Hollywood ending.

We can call the movie “The Revolution Starts Now” after the Steve Earle song (I have Steve Earle on the brain after he rocked my world at the Sellersville Theater Thursday night).

How’s that?

Nah, too close for comfort.

Bring on the vampires and zombies and keep on annoying me.

I’ll be OK. It’s just another example of … drum roll … What Is And What Should Never Be.

Ready for more?

What Is: A study conducted by the University of Michigan – my favorite college football team once each year, when Penn State is the opponent – reveals that making connections, via Facebook, might have us singing the blues.

And What Should Never Be: Letting a positive turn into a negative.

The point of the study was a good one. Facebook time can cause us to compare our lives to that of others and leaving us coming away feeling like we have bought one-way tickets to Loserville.

I have been there, done that. Not gonna lie.

For myself, being home a lot this summer with Sofia has led to time interacting on Facebook, often engaging in political debates and just touching base with people I am better for knowing.

It’s just a phase, though. I have gone – and will go – through others where it’s a secondary activity and not my immediate connection to the outside world.

We just have to take it for it is, and stare the truth in the eye.

Certain people, for whatever reason – who and what they represent in relation to our own life and times, and ensuing trials and tribulations – can put us in a funk by paging through their pictures or status posts about how they are in this place or that enjoying wine and cheese with friends.

But this is an onion that needs peeling, the study cautions. In actuality, it is the people who “socialize the most in real life” that are most prone to these oft-unhealthy comparisons.

According to John Jonides, the research co-author and a University of Michigan cognitive neuroscientist: “It suggests that when you are engaging in social interactions a lot, you’re more aware of what others are doing and, consequently, you might be more sensitized about what’s happening on Facebook and comparing that to your own life.”

I would have to say that more good than bad has come of entering the Facebook universe that allows room to breathe, despite 1.1 billion co-inhabitants.

What Is: Just to prove that man does not live by Facebook alone, a more recent discovery – Netflix – has opened up new horizons.

And What Should Never Be: Having a closed mind.

I had heard how Netflix reinvented itself for years, but figured the likes of HBO had me covered in the quest for inspiring and intriguing entertainment.

Even knowing that Netflix had an original series starring Steven Van Zandt wasn’t enough.

But then I got an iPad for my birthday in March and I took the plunge, figuring seeing the likes of “The Wonder Years” and “Star Trek” – while playing catch-up on “Mad Men” — was worth the price of admission.

Turns out, I went off in a completely different direction. First it was “Sons Of Anarchy.” Then, a friend told me about a show called “Freaks and Geeks” about high school in the early 1980s, which is when we were in high school. The only bad part of the show was that it only lasted one season and left me lamenting what could and should have been.

Next, I turned to the Van Zandt vehicle, “Lillyhammer,” and got a kick out of him pretty much reprising the role of Silvio Dante (“The Sopranos”) in a bizarre setting (a New York mob guy in witness protection in Norway).

The cool thing about Netflix is that, like Facebook, it takes a snapshot of what you like and suggests more ideas.

That led me to another original Netflix series, “Orange Is The New Black,” and I roared through the first season in about two weeks. Ditto for the award-winning “House of Cards.”

HBO cornered the market with the catch-phrase of “it’s not TV, it’s HBO.” Now, one has to consider saying, “it’s not HBO, it’s Netflix.”

Then again, “Boardwalk Empire” returns Sept. 8 on HBO.

How do I know?

Facebook.

What Is: The aforementioned Steve Earle – even though his show ended too late to stay in line for an autograph, which I may live to regret – got me thinking about our place and time in history (including the story line for the movie, as he spoke of his toddler son with autism).

And Should Never Be: Not turning the deep thinking to action.

Earle explained that all songwriters of his generation follow in Bob Dylan’s footsteps, whether they want to admit it or not (don’t the ones who refuse to submit just annoy you?). He continued to explain that Dylan modeled himself after Woody Guthrie, whose legacy was pretty much creating the realistic soundtrack of The Great Depression era. Earle added that Dylan would be the first to admit that he never experienced America going through the hard times as seen through the eyes of his hero, Guthrie.

Earle, who has been touring by bus for a while, said that it has struck him that the America he is now seeing is as horrific as that of Guthrie’s time.

And he’s spot-on accurate.

I blame Bush, you blame Obama.

Others point to Wall Street.

And maybe we should just look in the mirror, blame ourselves and start doing something about it.

After Earle and his band – The Dukes – aptly ended their show with “The Revolution Starts Now,” the lights went up and a recording of Guthrie’s “This Land Is Your Land” (should be the national anthem, but don’t get me started on that) began to play.

It sounded new again.

It sounded great.

Related articles

Welcome To American History Z

By GORDON GLANTZ

Gordonglantz50@gmail.com

@Managing2Edit

GORDONVILLE – Welcome, class, to American History Z.

Kind of has a nice ring to it. “X” is already taken by the phenomenal movie starring Edward Norton, and “Y” implies we don’t know, when we do.

Plus, “Z” indicates a bottom line, the isle of last resort.

History, unlike a skew viewed of the truth, cannot be changed.

It is the Hotel California. You can check out anytime you like, but you can never leave. It’s always there.

Here at Gordonville U., we don’t hang the 10 commandments in public places. But that doesn’t mean we don’t adhere to most.  We do, but with some additions and subtractions.

The key subtraction is the Sabbath and keeping it holy. We’ll gladly take that trade in exchange for: Thou Shall Not Pervert History, which is kind of akin to bearing false witness.

The reasoning is simple. You are bound to repeat history, and are committing a gargantuan sin by spreading ignorance to future generations.

We find the most egregious offenders in the wicked world of political views, but it seems that those on the right – the Party of No – seem to have the market cornered.

Twitter and Facebook allows for an instant window into their mind set, and I’m seeing serious lies.

Perhaps they are joking with some of this misinformation, but given that the most on right are of ill humor, it is highly unlikely.

Let’s start simple, with the semi-regular crapola from the right about how Abraham Lincoln freed the slaves and that he was a Republican. Again, a sick and twisted perversion, to which I sentence these transgressors to 40 hours of American History Z (no predatory student loans required).

Yes, Honest Abe belonged to a political party called Republican, but it does not resemble today’s Republican Party.

If it did, they would genuflect in front of him instead of Ronald Reagan at each presidential convention.

But quietly, in the dark world that is social media, they use this nonsense to pounce on the gullible like trout on the first day of fishing season.

Lincoln was a liberal, a progressive. Doesn’t exactly sound like someone who would advocate voting to repeal Obamacare 6,551 times instead of getting anything of substance done.

The change in platforms came when the country went to Hell in a hand basket on the Republicans’ watch (Calvin Coolidge, Herbert Hoover) and a new Democrat with a new deal, Franklin Deleno Roosevelt, enacted policies to dig the country out of The Great Depression and to the precipice of victory in World War II.

From that point on, it was Democrats – not Republicans – who picked up the dropped and tarnished baton of Lincoln and carried it toward a hopeful finish line by making Jim Crow an outlaw. It was the post-FDR Democrats who sought to feed the hungry, clothe the poor and give shelter to the homeless.

But the misinformation pipeline does not end there.

I came across another feed about the year 1913, which apparently is becoming a battle cry among the “Don’t Tread On Me” types that misspell the signs they tote at Tea Party gatherings.

That was the year the 16th amendment – i.e. income tax – was ratified (it was actually introduced in 1909).

I know they resent being taxed to share services with their fellow Americans, while remaining blind to the fact that the real issue is that the wealthiest among us – left (Democrat), right (Tea Party, as the GOP is on life support) and indifferent (Independent, Libertarian)  don’t pay their fair share.

That’s part of the debate; part of the two versions of the truth and the real truth lying somewhere in the middle, which is theoretically healthy.

The fact vs. fiction, where History goes on trial for its life, is the attempt to say that America was totally awesome up until then — which it probably was for White Anglo-Saxon Protestants of the male gender. For them, as bosses and industrialists, it was all hunky dory.

Not for most women, blacks, steel workers, coal miners and Catholic/Jewish recent immigrants of the time.

The post I saw – from an entity called the Comical Conservative – claiming that we still had schools (check out the literacy rate and how long the average child attended) and colleges (for the rich and famous). They say there were roads (we quickly out-grew what we had then, and they know it), vast railroads (in lieu of airlines, since the Wright Bros. were only 10 years removed from making a plane fly at the speed of a paper airplane), streets (see roads) and subways (see roads, vast railroads).

And, right on cue, 1913 America had a military that boasted an 8-0 record (would have been 0-1 without France’s help in the Revolutionary War, but that’s a buried truth).

OK, you want to play? Let’s play.

Let’s peel away at this potato (which was one of the only forms of sustenance for many Americans then).

In 1913, the year the country was allegedly idyllic:

-In addition to the 16th Amendment, we also had the 17th Amendment, which allowed the actual people of each state – well, the male voters and the white male voters down yonder – to elect their own senators (as opposed to state legislatures playing politics and paying off favors).

-A year after a parade in New York, the women’s suffrage parade – with black women marching at the back, so as not to offend any Southerners considering allowing women the right to vote – took place in Washington, D.C., setting the stage for 1920, when the 19th Amendment was passed, allowing women to vote. We still have not had a woman president, unlike a good number of democracies.

-In Atlanta, a 13-year-old girl named Mary Phagan was raped and strangled to death. Her boss happened to be a perceived interloper from the New York City, a “Yankee Jew” named Leo Frank. Because he was the last one to see her alive, the populist politicians of the time conspired with the prosecutors to suppress evidence that would have created reasonable doubt. He was sentenced to death. While the governor considered commuting the sentence, he conducted his own investigation and was troubled by what he discovered. He lessened the sentence to life in jail, but that wasn’t good enough for a populace consistently whipped into a frenzied state by newspaper editorials. In 1915, several prominent citizens of Marietta, Ga. formed a posse and stormed the prison. Likely with the help of some personnel inside, they removed Frank and lynched him. This event led to the formation of the Anti-Defamation League, but also the revival of the KKK that reached an apex in the 1920s.

-In Michigan, a miner’s strike that began in 1912 was still ongoing on Christmas Eve of 1913 when the union threw a party for the families of the striking miners. Someone at the party – and evidence suggests it was a corporate thug with specific orders – yelled “fire,” causing a stampede that the led to the death of 73 recent immigrants from Finland, Croatia and Italy. Of the 73 killed, 59 were children. In 1941, Woody Guthrie immortalized the incident with the song “1913 Masscare.”

-Seeking similar improvements in the workplace as those in Michigan – humane conditions, better hours and wages – garment workers in New York and Boston went on strike.

-They all should have been happy to be here and not complain? Consider that there were 25,000 deaths due to industrial accidents.

-“Camels” hit the market as the first packaged cigarette (a nation’s lungs were never the same).

-Phi Sigma Sigma became the first nonsectarian sorority. Doesn’t sound like much now to have diversity, but this was a bold move at the time.

With or without taxes, it doesn’t sound like we have come too far in 100 years, other than that most of us are a little bit more polite to each other’s faces.

Except now we have Social Media – Twitter and Facebook – where fact and fiction are so easily confused, and where it’s the grade “F” all around in American History Z.

The Ghost of Trayvon Martin

By GORDON GLANTZ

Gordonglantz50@gmail.com

@Managing2Edit

ImageGORDONVILLE – There may not be an American old enough to understand who does not have an opinion on the George Zimmerman verdict in the killing of Trayvon Martin, and now is not the time to mute discourse because we are “tired of it.”

After the verdict, I immediately tried to put myself in the place of a black American who is the parent of a teen, or pre-teen, and wondering what – in the wake of the not guilty verdict – I could possibly say to my child about simple things, like walking down the street to or from the store, that would make sense.

I came up empty.

Instead, Ifollowed a path to try and connect the dots and make sense of it.

I went back to the recent July 4th weekend, when the discussion with my friends for life drifted from each of the four major sports teams in town to the television show “Freaks and Geeks,” the critical acclaim of which could not push it past one season.

It sparked a spirited debate.

Were we more like the class-cutting, music-loving “freaks” or the un-athletic, oft-bullied “geeks?”

We probably weren’t as cool or free-spirited as the “freaks” or as pathetically nerdy and neurotic as the “geeks” (only one friend saw us that way, which may say more about how he sees himself) but it was an interesting drill.

The truth is that we were neither back in the day.

In the early 1980s – the setting of “Freaks and Geeks” — we were just kids.

I am no sociologist (my uncle Oscar was, though, if that counts), but my unscientific analysis views that time period like this: About 5 percent of the kids were too good to be true.  Angels on earth, they rarely got less than an A on their report cards, helped old ladies cross the street and spent their spare time volunteering at the hospital or church.

Another 5 percent were completely incorrigible devils who probably should have been locked up early to avoid the rush.

The rest of us, the other 90 percent, were – to varying degrees – somewhere in the middle.

If we were at-risk, it was for being most likely to fall through the cracks.

Temporarily lost, we usually managed to find ourselves later along life’s crazy path, but high school was a time to be a ghost.

We all had scrapes with disciplinarians in school, earning detentions and suspensions for silly transgressions like having a Sony Walkman in the hall or going up the down staircase, but we had no juvenile records or anything of that magnitude.

Like most, I wore the standard uniform of the time – beat-up jeans and one of my concert shirts (the ones where the sleeves came three-quarters of the way down the arm).

I had wild and crazy hair that, outside of school, often had a bandana buried in it (I couldn’t quite bring myself to try the Steve Van Zandt look).

For a mental picture, try a thinner Juan Epstein with a Led Zeppelin or Rush or Yes concert shirt.

We spent our weekend nights – and some days when attending school didn’t seem to make sense, for a variety of incongruent reasons – on the streets of Northeast Philly. You could find us  in the local record store, debating the merits of vinyl versus cassette (CDs were looming, but not yet in hand). Later at night, when the Roosevelt Mall closed, we would be ducking in and out of the shadows of back alleys and what passed for urban woods.

I don’t mean to over-romanticize it or make it sound like fodder for a Springsteen song. It was, more or less, pathetic.

Mostly, we staked out these concrete havens to drink beer – and other stuff – and then we dispersed, usually at or around whatever curfew was, and made our way home in separate directions.

I’m sure, while walking alone, we each appeared aimless; as if we were up to “no good.” Surely, people peered out of their windows with a suspicious eye. A few times, we each interfaced with police. It seemed like a stroke of bad luck if an officer – likely smelling alcohol (or something) – reminded us of the time of night and took down our names and addresses.

It likely never progressed beyond that because, well, these officers were trained professionals. They had “cop’s eyes,” and could tell if someone was really a menace to society or just another kid on his way home – more or less a ghost — on another Friday night.

There was one thing working in our favor, too. We all had white skin. That surely stopped any wannabe cops – any Charles Bronson types – from taking the law into their hands in what then was an all-white working class ’hood.

It may have saved our lives so that we can reflect, more than 30 years later, about whether we were “freaks” or “geeks” and laugh about it.

By contrast, we didn’t have the experience relayed by President Obama the other day about his teen years 35 years ago.

He, like us, lived to tell the tale.

Trayvon Martin was not so fortunate on the night of Feb. 26, 2012.

For him, there will be no chance for hindsight about a semi-misbegotten youth, a time when it is a natural instinct to challenge authority on some level and to have a fight-or-flight response that is not fully formed.

As we all know, Martin was in a townhouse development as an invited guest of a resident – the fiancé of his father – walking alone.

Like a lot of teens, he probably wanted to be somewhere else. And if he were somewhere else, he probably wouldn’t want to be there, either.

He was wearing the uniform of his generation – a hoodie — and dared to not walk on the sidewalk and cut between houses. And topping it off, he was not affected by the rain.

Consult any Psychology 101 textbook and it will tell how teens feel invincible from greater dangers than some water falling from the sky. A trained professional, not a wannabe cop like George Zimmerman, might have known that.

And let’s say, for the sheer sake of argument, the 17-year-old Martin was “up to no good.”

Is a sudden death sentence, without a trial, the proper punishment – in America or any other civilized nation – for crimes such as vandalism or petty theft?

Zimmerman, playing judge and jury, seemed to think so.

No one really knows exactly what happened right before Zimmerman shot Martin through the heart at close range, but we can deduce that he – thinking he was standing in as an officer of the law – was profiling Martin because of his skin color and perceived menacing appearance. For lack of a better term,  Zimmerman“stalked” him for it.

Martin felt a need to defend himself against a man who did not identify himself as a police officer. He got the better of Zimmerman in the ensuing physical struggle, and it cost him his life.

He was the one who was unarmed in the encounter. He was the one who ended up dead. Zimmerman is the one found not guilty.

Not guilty?

It may not have been second degree murder, but it sure seems like a clear-cut case of manslaughter.

This is a quirk in the system, not only judicial, but in workplaces and schoolyards and taverns.

Someone (Martin) is sufficiently baited by another (Zimmerman) and justifiably responds. They are then vilified, after the fact, because they had the temerity to adequately defend themselves.

Of all that was considered as court fodder – like Martin breaking some oft-bent rules in school and Zimmerman doing the same when he tussled with a cop and had a PFA filed against him by his former fiancé – the fact that Martin was whipping his profiler’s butt seemed, to me, not as relevant as the cause-and-effect of the original interaction between them.

Saying Zimmerman acted in self-defense and calling it a day, well, it just doesn’t fit.

And if it doesn’t fit, you can’t acquit.

But the jury did anyway, pretty much killing Trayvon Martin all over again, and turning him into a ghost who now haunts the nation as it sleeps.

Pretzel Logic

foul-ball-injury_5

By GORDON GLANTZ

Gordonglantz50@gmail.com

@Managing2Edit

GORDONVILLE – While clicking around the television dial the other night, I must have been really bored because I stopped to watch a baseball game that didn’t even involve the Phillies.

I don’t mean to knock the national pastime, it’s just that sitting through a meaningless May/June contest and analyzing every strategic maneuver is not my ideal idea of fun.

So there I was, at least for one pitch, watching — and mostly waiting — while the batter stepped out of the batter’s box and back in while the pitcher shook off the catcher 54 times.

As per usual, that one pitch led to a foul ball into empty seats down the left-field line. And a mob of spectators ran towards the batted ball, as if miners in pursuit of a chunk of gold during the California gold rush of yore.

This oddity – this fascination with a baseball that you can buy for a nominal price in any sporting goods store – is one of many listed on my I-don’t-get-it list.

Also on the list is the fascination with vampire tales, English royalty, Hollywood sequels and golf (this thing at Merion can’t be over soon enough).

Shifting gears to more serious matters, I don’t quite get why any president of the United StatesBarack Obama, at present — is automatically considered “the leader of the free world” upon election.

No, he is the president of the United States. That’s his job, 24/7. No moonlighting needed, or required, at least for this gig. Not until we get our own act together.

It is rather arrogant – a trait as American as baseball, apple pie and institutional racism – to assume we set the tone for anything on the world stage.

By definition, to be a leader, you have to lead in something. And according to “Ranking America,” we hold the top spot in:

-Anxiety and mood disorders

-Plastic surgeons -Breast Augmentation

-Spending on clothes and shoes

-Registered vehicles

-Criminal prosecutions and prisoners

-Nuclear reactors

-Military spending and exports of arms and ammunition

-Health spending.

By contrast to these dubious distinctions, we rank:

-14th in college graduation

-23rd (out of 45 “more developed countries”) on the women’s index

-70th in women in government

-37th in upholding the rule of law (i.e. human rights) -18th (out of 40) in reading

-61st in monetary freedom

-17th in medical school graduates

-35th in math

-15th in literacy

-64th in human security

-21st in happiness

-22nd in freedom from corruption

-58th in commitment to change in energy consumption

-50th in erection length (explaining a lot about resistance to gun control)

And lastly, and most incongruous to the “leader of the free world” jazz (the real leader would likely hail from somewhere in Scandinavia, judging by the indexes), come these cold and hard factoids:

-22nd in freedom of the press

-17th in democracy.

 Ouch.

Talk about being kicked in a sensitive area, huh?

Since the president being the leader of the free world is mere myth – more indulgent perception than star-spangled reality – then the president being the world’s chief of police can certainly be dismissed offhand.

We do what we can, when we can, but let’s be real.

The events of last Sept. 11 in Benghazi were tragic, but president Obama could not have prevented them anymore than he could have prevented Hurricane Sandy or the recent spate of tornadoes (we also lead the world in those).

Radical Muslims will do what they do – commit violence in the name of religion – as much as the present-day force of nature known as climate-change-induced superstorms.

That’s a reality we have to live with, but instead some are sullying the victims’ memories by playing the blame game for political reasons. This is especially true – if not ironic – when you consider from where the venom is being spewed. When you look at the key areas where we don’t rank, and not even in the top 10, most of the shared blame can go the same Republicans who don’t let Obama come up for air.

For example, in the area of education – math, science and literacy – the states that bring us down are always red come election day.

Ditto on many of the quality of life rankings listed above.

And they have too much blood – American blood – on their paws to claw at Obama.

On the tragedy meter, not much ranks higher than mass shootings like the one in Newtown, Conn., which happened three months after Benghazi but has been swept under the rug because of the touchy dialogue it spawned on gun control.

In the wake of Newtown – and with knowledge that more than 30,000 Americans die by the gun each year (we also rank first in death by violence) – Republican leaders ignored public opinion in favor of self-interest and conspired to shoot down even baby steps toward sane gun control.

This makes them accessories, albeit after the fact, to the accepted madness. They have other fish to fry. Problem is, it’s not edible. Don’t be tempted to consume it. Four people, four people who understood the risks when they accepted their assignments, died in Benghazi.

That’s not to say it wasn’t a tragedy, or that it wasn’t something to learn from going forward, but you can only brace for it the way you can brace for a tornado or hurricane the next time one hits. You can’t stop them from happening again.

Right-wing pretzel logic to twist and turn it into something it isn’t – comparing it to Richard Nixon’s follies, that ended when finally caught with his hand in a cookie jar labeled Watergate — would be funny if it weren’t so sad.

When George “Wingnut” Bush was president, he enacted The Patriot Act in the wake of 9/11 (which happened when his team was asleep at the wheel, despite warnings of terroristic attacks within the country). The Republicans were quick to defend him, calling it necessary.

And yet, when Osama bin Laden, the mastermind of 9/11 was killed on Obama’s watch, they were short on praise and long on rolling their eyes when the president “spiked the ball” and dared do a touchdown dance (unlike the premature adulation of Bush and his “mission accomplished” ceremony to declare the Iraqi War over when that national heartbreak had just begun).

Now, in the wake of the Boston marathon bombings – which have quickly, and nefariously, joined Benghazi and co-replaced Newtown in the public’s psyche because it removes the gun issue and replaces it with bad guys with funny names who pray to Allah – they are critical of Obama for enacting similar, though more sophisticated, measures of keeping us safe from domestic terrorism.

The wrong-minded on the right will go to any lengths – suppressing the vote, calling the man-made human condition “God’s will” – to prove a point when they have none that are salient.

 They say nope to hope.

They resist change.

They call themselves the “real” Americans – implying anyone not seen by their tunnel vision isn’t — and get away with it.

Their motives are as transparent as the painted smile on the face of a beauty pageant contestant, and yet many follow their lead.

And I don’t get it.

Chasing after a foul ball, or watching Queen Elizabeth christen a ship, makes more sense.